[PATCH 4/6] malloc: Improve free checks

Adhemerval Zanella Netto adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org
Mon Apr 14 13:37:47 GMT 2025



On 31/03/25 09:59, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
> 
> The checks on size can be merged and use __builtin_add_overflow.  Since
> tcache only handles small sizes (and rejects sizes < MINSIZE), delay this
> check until after tcache.

LGTM, I see that you did change to use the __glibc_unlikely.

Reviewed-by: Adhemerval Zanella  <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>

> 
> ---
> 
> diff --git a/malloc/malloc.c b/malloc/malloc.c
> index 24a2d50ec845d379e7eae0a2360cb669a06504ea..f8f35b337d91a0a4790d27163728fec53083f026 100644
> --- a/malloc/malloc.c
> +++ b/malloc/malloc.c
> @@ -3465,16 +3465,8 @@ __libc_free (void *mem)
>  
>    INTERNAL_SIZE_T size = chunksize (p);
>  
> -  /* Little security check which won't hurt performance: the
> -     allocator never wraps around at the end of the address space.
> -     Therefore we can exclude some size values which might appear
> -     here by accident or by "design" from some intruder.  */
> -  if (__builtin_expect ((uintptr_t) p > (uintptr_t) -size, 0)
> -      || __builtin_expect (misaligned_chunk (p), 0))
> +  if (__glibc_unlikely (misaligned_chunk (p)))
>      malloc_printerr ("free(): invalid pointer");
> -  /* We know that each chunk is at least MINSIZE bytes.  */
> -  if (__glibc_unlikely (size < MINSIZE))
> -    malloc_printerr ("free(): invalid size");
>  
>    check_inuse_chunk (arena_for_chunk (p), p);
>  
> @@ -3483,6 +3475,11 @@ __libc_free (void *mem)
>      return;
>  #endif
>  
> +  /* Check size >= MINSIZE and p + size does not overflow.  */
> +  if (__glibc_unlikely (__builtin_add_overflow_p ((uintptr_t) p, size - MINSIZE,
> +						  (uintptr_t) 0)))
> +    malloc_printerr ("free(): invalid size");
> +
>    _int_free_chunk (arena_for_chunk (p), p, size, 0);
>  }
>  libc_hidden_def (__libc_free)
> 



More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list