[RFC PATCH] realloc: Make REALLOC_ZERO_BYTES_FREES into a tunable
Paul Eggert
eggert@cs.ucla.edu
Tue Oct 22 15:56:12 GMT 2024
On 2024-10-22 08:52, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> That'll still need a symbol in the program at runtime, won't it? There
> needs to be some way for the realloc (in libc) to decide which path to
> go down.
Yes, it'd need a new runtime symbol, like the other feature-test macros.
Or rather two symbols, as reallocarray is also affected.
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list