[PATCH v2] libio: Add test case for fflush
Florian Weimer
fweimer@redhat.com
Thu Nov 7 15:59:19 GMT 2024
* Frédéric Bérat:
> diff --git a/libio/Makefile b/libio/Makefile
> index 4370152964..27534b9675 100644
> --- a/libio/Makefile
> +++ b/libio/Makefile
> @@ -100,6 +100,8 @@ tests = \
> tst-fclose-unopened \
> tst-fclose-unopened2 \
> tst-fdopen-seek-failure \
> + tst-fflush \
> + tst-fflush-NULL \
> tst-fgetc-after-eof \
> tst-fgetwc \
> tst-fgetws \
> @@ -146,6 +148,9 @@ tests = \
> tst_wscanf \
> # tests
>
> +# tst-fflush-NULL as XFAIL until read stream bug is fixed
> +test-xfail-tst-fflush-NULL = yes
Please file a new bug in Bugzilla and reference its number in the
comment.
> diff --git a/libio/tst-fflush-skeleton.c b/libio/tst-fflush-skeleton.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..5db9fc96da
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/libio/tst-fflush-skeleton.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,196 @@
> +#ifndef FILE_FLUSH_TYPE
> +# define FILE_FLUSH_TYPE FILE_FLUSH
> +# define S_FLUSH_TYPE "FILE"
> +#endif
I suggest to put this in to the libio/tst-fflush.c wrapper.
> +struct
> +{
> + FILE *file;
> + char *name;
> + int fd;
> + char *mfile;
> +} files[TEST_FILE_COUNT];
> +
> +static void
> +base_init (int file)
> +{
> + files[file].file = NULL;
> + files[file].fd = -1;
> + files[file].name = NULL;
> + files[file].mfile = NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +file_init (int file)
> +{
> + int fd = -1;
> +
> + base_init (file);
> +
> + if (file >= TEST_FILE_COUNT)
> + return;
> +
> + xclose (create_temp_file ("tst-fflush", &files[file].name));
> +
> + fd = xopen (files[file].name, O_RDONLY, 0);
> + files[file].mfile = (char *) xmmap (NULL, CONTENT_SZ_MAX, PROT_READ,
> + MAP_SHARED, fd);
> + xclose (fd);
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +file_cleanup (int file)
> +{
> + free (files[file].name);
> + xmunmap (files[file].mfile, CONTENT_SZ_MAX);
> +
> + base_init (file);
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +file_changed (int to_check, int global_flush, const char *mode)
> +{
This could use FILE_FLUSH_TYPE directly.
> + struct stat stats = { };
> + bool content_matches = 0;
> + char expected[CONTENT_SZ_MAX] = { };
> +
> + verbose_printf ("Check that %s (%d) exactly contains the data we put in\n",
> + files[to_check].name, to_check);
> +
> + /* File should contain "N:M" where both N and M are one digit exactly. */
> + snprintf (expected, sizeof (expected), "%d:%d", global_flush, to_check);
> + content_matches
> + = (strncmp (files[to_check].mfile, expected, sizeof (expected)) == 0);
I think this should use memcmp, not strncmp? So perhaps
TEST_COMPARE_BLOB (files[to_check].mfile, sizeof (expected),
expected, sizeof (expected));
> + TEST_VERIFY_EXIT (content_matches != 0);
Maybe:
if (support_record_failure_is_failed)
FAIL_EXIT1 ("exiting due to previous failure");
We should probably something like
support_record_failure_barrier ();
for that.
> + TEST_VERIFY_EXIT (fstat (files[to_check].fd, &stats) >= 0);
> + TEST_VERIFY_EXIT (stats.st_size == 3);
> + if (strncmp(mode, "r", 1) == 0)
Missing space before “(mode”. Alternatively, just use: mode[0] == 'r'
> + TEST_VERIFY_EXIT (lseek (files[to_check].fd, 0, SEEK_CUR) == 1);
> + else
> + TEST_VERIFY_EXIT (lseek (files[to_check].fd, 0, SEEK_CUR) == 3);
I think the exit isn't required, so maybe (with a comment)?
TEST_COMPARE (lseek (files[to_check].fd, 0, SEEK_CUR),
mode[0] == 'r' ? 1 : 3);
> + /* Not reached if the data doesn't match. */
> + return FILE_CHANGED;
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +file_flush (int global_flush, const char *mode)
> +{
> + for (int i = 0; i < TEST_FILE_COUNT; i++) {
“{” should be on its own line.
> + files[i].file = xfopen (files[i].name, mode);
> + TEST_VERIFY_EXIT (files[i].file != NULL);
> + files[i].fd = fileno (files[i].file);
> + }
> +
> + /* Print a unique identifier in each file, that is not too long nor contain
> + new line to not trigger _IO_OVERFLOW/_IO_SYNC. */
> + for (int i = 0; i < TEST_FILE_COUNT; i++) {
Likewise.
> + if (strncmp(mode, "r", 1) == 0)
Missing space, or even better: mode[0] == 'r'
> + {
> + char c = (char) fgetc (files[i].file);
> + c = (char) fgetc (files[i].file);
> + ungetc (c, files[i].file);
Please make the ungetc conditional and run this subtest twice.
> + }
> + else
> + {
> + fprintf (files[i].file, "%d:%d", global_flush, i);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (global_flush)
Could use FILE_FLUSH_TYPE directly.
> + {
> + fflush (NULL);
> + }
> + else
> + {
> + for (int i = 0; i < TEST_FILE_COUNT; i++)
> + fflush (files[i].file);
> + }
Missing checks for fflush return values.
Overall structure of the test looks reasonable to me, thanks.
Florian
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list