Question on backporting. [Was Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] powerpc: Add HWCAP3/HWCAP4 data to TCB for Power Architecture.]
Adhemerval Zanella Netto
adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org
Wed Mar 20 20:09:12 GMT 2024
On 20/03/24 16:08, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho wrote:
> Peter Bergner <bergner@linux.ibm.com> writes:
>
>> As someone new to the Power maintainership role, can someone help explain
>> the process/rules for backporting changes into the release branches?
>
> I like the explanation from this section of the wiki:
> https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Release/#General_policy
>
>> As port maintainer do I have discretion to decide whether this patch
>> can be backported to the release branches or do I need consensus that
>> backporting it is ok?
>
> In my interpretation, consensus is still important, but your input is
> also very important.
> With that said I believe both patches fall into the following:
>
> ... any patch on master that doesn't change ABI or API is immediately
> suitable for backporting to a stable branch.
>
> This is what I'd do, assuming there are no time constraints:
>
> 1. Submit both patches to libc-stable.
> 2. If nobody objects, push the changes to the stable branch.
>
Both patch should be ok to backport, since the trickiest that added
__tcb_parse_hwcap_and_convert_at_platform was done on 2.39.
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list