state of the ports
Andreas K. Huettel
dilfridge@gentoo.org
Fri Feb 2 21:40:41 GMT 2024
Am Freitag, 2. Februar 2024, 12:28:45 CET schrieb Florian Weimer:
> * Xi Ruoyao:
>
> > On Fri, 2024-02-02 at 15:51 +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
> >> On Fri, 2024-02-02 at 03:35 +0100, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> >> > mips (n64)
> >> > - mostly math failures
> >>
> >> They are some sort of 2 ulp vs expected 1 ulp things. I'm not yet sure
> >> if they are hardware issues or Glibc bugs.
> >
> > Something like:
> >
> > is : 3 ulp
> > accepted: 2 ulp
[..]
> >
> > I'm really not an expert in numerical analysis. Any pointer to debug
> > such a thing further?
That looks like it can be "fixed" by regenerate-ulps, not like a real bug.
So the real number of fails is likely smaller indeed. \o/
--
Andreas K. Hüttel
dilfridge@gentoo.org
Gentoo Linux developer
(council, comrel, toolchain, base-system, perl, libreoffice)
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/User:Dilfridge
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/attachments/20240202/69452c71/attachment.sig>
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list