[PATCH] math: Exclude internal math symbols for tests [BZ #32414]
Joseph Myers
josmyers@redhat.com
Thu Dec 5 10:29:54 GMT 2024
On Thu, 5 Dec 2024, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2024 at 9:04 AM H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Since internal tests don't have access to internal symbols in libm,
> > exclude them for internal tests. Also make tst-strtod5 and tst-strtod5i
> > depend on $(libm) to support older versions of GCC which can't inline
> > copysign family functions. This fixes BZ #32414.
> >
> >
> > --
> > H.J.
>
> It is used in glibc build for some targets:
>
> FAIL: glibcs-powerpc-linux-gnu build
> FAIL: glibcs-powerpc-linux-gnu-power4 build
> FAIL: glibcs-powerpc64le-linux-gnu build
> FAIL: glibcs-powerpc-linux-gnu-soft build
> FAIL: glibcs-powerpc64-linux-gnu build
> FAIL: glibcs-powerpc64le-linux-gnu-disable-multi-arch build
> FAIL: glibcs-sparcv9-linux-gnu build
> FAIL: glibcs-sparc64-linux-gnu build
>
> But they shouldn't be declared in the installed header.
Please give more details of the failures you see (with this patch, as
opposed to the "[PATCH] math: Don't declare __XXX math functions [BZ
#32418]" one). It seems rather odd for a change adding !IS_IN
(testsuite_internal) conditionals to break the build of glibc itself.
(And this patch is only changing non-installed files, it's nothing to do
with what's in installed headers.)
--
Joseph S. Myers
josmyers@redhat.com
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list