[PATCH v7] malloc: Optimize small memory clearing for calloc
H.J. Lu
hjl.tools@gmail.com
Wed Dec 4 00:16:37 GMT 2024
On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 7:32 AM Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu> wrote:
>
> On 2024-12-02 20:42, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > + /* Use repeated stores with 1 branch, instead of up to 3. */
> > + *(d + 0) = 0;
> > + *(d + 1) = 0;
> > + *(d + 2) = 0;
> > + *(d + nclears - 2) = 0;
> > + *(d + nclears - 2 + 1) = 0;
> > + if (nclears > 5)
> > + {
> > + *(d + 3) = 0;
> > + *(d + 3 + 1) = 0;
> > + *(d + nclears - 4) = 0;
> > + *(d + nclears - 4 + 1) = 0;
> > + }
>
> The following alternative code has no branches, when I compile with GCC
> 14 -O2 on x86-64. Would that be a win?
>
> /* Use repeated stores with no branches. */
> int big = 3 * ((nclears + 1) >> 3);
> d[0] = 0;
> d[1] = 0;
> d[2] = 0;
> d[big] = 0;
> d[big + 1] = 0;
> d[nclears - big - 1] = 0;
> d[nclears - big] = 0;
> d[nclears - 2] = 0;
> d[nclears - 2 + 1] = 0;
>
Wangyang, can you try this against the current master branch?
Thanks.
--
H.J.
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list