[patch] aligned_alloc: conform to C17

DJ Delorie dj@redhat.com
Fri Mar 17 19:55:54 GMT 2023


Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu> writes:
> As you mention the C17 wording is not entirely clear, but it's 
> implausible that the standardizers intended 0 to be a valid alignment: 
> if they had intended that they would have said so clearly.

I think I was trying to agree with you, using more than "that makes
sense" :-)

The "char align is weakest" statement seems to be the key one.



More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list