[PATCH v3 1/2] elf,nptl: Add -z lazy to some more tests

[Arsen Arsenović]

Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> writes:

> * Arsen Arsenović:
>
>> Yes, I never signed the copyright papers for the libc.
>>
>> I intended to undergo that process, which is why I didn't add signoffs
>> initially (since they'd indicate that I don't intend to sign over
>> copyright when I do), so I figured I should wait for advice.
>>
>> How should I proceed?
>
> It's up to you.  You can try the FSF paperwork process, it should be
> fully digital nowadays.  And we can apply the patch as a regular FSF
> contribution once the paperwork is complete.

My previous experiences were rather prompt (usually done by the time I'm
done with a patchset - not the case here due to the triviality, of
course).  Is
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gnulib.git/plain/doc/Copyright/request-assign.future
the right form?  This is the one I've used for gcc et al, to cover
current and future changes of any nature.

> Or we can take a DCO contribution from you today.  We don't need the
> assignment paperwork anymore.
>
>> PS: I noticed that I forgot to drop `,nptl' from the subject line.  The
>> NPTL bits of this patch are gone now.
>
> Ah, okay.
>
> Thanks,
> Florian


-- 
Arsen Arsenović
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 381 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/attachments/20230307/10d4dbb1/attachment.sig>