[PATCH v3 03/16] sysdeps: Ensure ieee128*_chk routines to be properly named

[Paul E Murphy]

On 6/30/23 9:58 AM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2023-06-28 04:42, Frédéric Bérat wrote:
>> The *_chk routines naming doesn't match the name that would be generated
>> using libc_hidden_ldbl_proto. Since the macro is needed for some of
>> these *_chk functions for _FORTIFY_SOURCE to be enabled, that needed to
>> be fixed.
>> While at it, all the *_chk function get renamed appropriately for
>> consistency, even if not strictly necessary.
>> ---
> 
> LGTM, but I'd like Raji to pitch in as well as ppc maintainer.


This LGTM (on behalf of Raji).  I am surprised this wasn't noticed 
sooner.  Was it not noticed because there are no internal calls within 
libc to these functions?

Reviewed-by: Paul E. Murphy <murphyp@linux.ibm.com>