[PATCH] linux: Split tst-ttyname
Adhemerval Zanella Netto
adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org
Mon Jun 5 18:21:34 GMT 2023
On 05/06/23 15:20, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Adhemerval Zanella Netto:
>
>> On 05/06/23 10:32, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>> * Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha:
>>>
>>>> sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/Makefile | 1 +
>>>> sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/tst-ttyname-common.c | 416 ++++++++++++++
>>>> .../unix/sysv/linux/tst-ttyname-namespace.c | 147 +++++
>>>> sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/tst-ttyname.c | 512 +-----------------
>>>> 4 files changed, 567 insertions(+), 509 deletions(-)
>>>> create mode 100644 sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/tst-ttyname-common.c
>>>> create mode 100644 sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/tst-ttyname-namespace.c
>>>
>>> I'd prefer if we could stop using the original tst-ttyname name for
>>> clarity.
>>
>> Do you mean for the new tst-ttyname-namespace or for tst-ttyname as well?
>> The test idea is really to check ttyname, so what exactly do you suggest
>> us to change?
>
> We've seen quite a few reports about tst-ttyname failures, and it would
> be nice if future reports would unambiguously refer to the split test.
> So perhaps tst-ttyname-direct?
Ah right, sounds reasonable.
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list