[PATCH] Account for octal marker in %#o format

[Carlos O'Donell]

On 1/30/23 06:11, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Andreas Schwab via Libc-alpha:
> 
>> @@ -257,6 +260,9 @@ LABEL (unsigned_number):      /* Unsigned number of base BASE.  */
>>            width -= 2;
>>          }
>>  
>> +      if (octal_marker)
>> +	--width;
>> +
>>        width -= number_length + prec;
> 
> This doesn't apply because master still has
> 
>       width -= workend - string + prec;
> 
> Apart from that, the change looks okay.
> 
> Carlos, this would be a regression, so I think we should fix it before
> the release.

Agreed. We should fix this ASAP for the 2.37 release.

Andreas, Thanks for putting together a fix. I'm reviewing this now.

-- 
Cheers,
Carlos.