[patch] Document '%F' format specifier

Siddhesh Poyarekar siddhesh@gotplt.org
Tue Jan 24 23:31:11 GMT 2023



On 2023-01-24 17:20, Paul Pluzhnikov wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 1:32 PM Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@gotplt.org> wrote:
> 
>>> -the @samp{%f} style.  A precision of @code{0}, is taken as 1.
>>> +the @samp{%f} of @same{%F} style.  A precision of @code{0}, is taken as 1.
>>
>> or @samp{%F}
> 
> Two typos in a row :-(
> Done (attached).

LGTM.

Reviewed-by: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@sourceware.org>

> I should still have commit-after-approval rights (I think).
> Just to confirm, it looks like ChangeLog has finally been abandoned?

Right, no need for ChangeLog.  Unfortunately however, since you replied 
with the patch (and did not do a git-send-email), patchwork[1] didn't 
pick this latest one up.  We like to have a 1:1 match for commits with 
patchwork but it's not enforced yet.

This won't affect your ability to push the patch but please make sure 
you have a coherent git commit message (your original message is fine) 
with the Reviewed-by line above when you push.  If you send your patch 
afresh as [committed] with git-send-email, we'll have a proper patchwork 
record too.

Thanks,
Sid


[1] 
https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/glibc/patch/CALoOobNE_v1z7WM5Js8-zpbuiFRr37Si0gCk13=wN2yBwDge_g@mail.gmail.com/


More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list