[patch] Document '%F' format specifier
Siddhesh Poyarekar
siddhesh@gotplt.org
Tue Jan 24 23:31:11 GMT 2023
On 2023-01-24 17:20, Paul Pluzhnikov wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 1:32 PM Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@gotplt.org> wrote:
>
>>> -the @samp{%f} style. A precision of @code{0}, is taken as 1.
>>> +the @samp{%f} of @same{%F} style. A precision of @code{0}, is taken as 1.
>>
>> or @samp{%F}
>
> Two typos in a row :-(
> Done (attached).
LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@sourceware.org>
> I should still have commit-after-approval rights (I think).
> Just to confirm, it looks like ChangeLog has finally been abandoned?
Right, no need for ChangeLog. Unfortunately however, since you replied
with the patch (and did not do a git-send-email), patchwork[1] didn't
pick this latest one up. We like to have a 1:1 match for commits with
patchwork but it's not enforced yet.
This won't affect your ability to push the patch but please make sure
you have a coherent git commit message (your original message is fine)
with the Reviewed-by line above when you push. If you send your patch
afresh as [committed] with git-send-email, we'll have a proper patchwork
record too.
Thanks,
Sid
[1]
https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/glibc/patch/CALoOobNE_v1z7WM5Js8-zpbuiFRr37Si0gCk13=wN2yBwDge_g@mail.gmail.com/
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list