[PATCH] Remap __GLIBC_FLT_EVAL_METHOD to 0 if __FLT_EVAL_METHOD__ is -1
Palmer Dabbelt
palmer@rivosinc.com
Sat Feb 18 18:29:34 GMT 2023
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 18:26:46 PST (-0800), kito.cheng@sifive.com wrote:
> ---
> We were intending to update RISC-V's setting only, but after discussion
> with Wilco Dijkstra, we decide to change the generic one instead of RISC-V only
> since it also fix inefficient issue for float_t and double_t.
> ---
>
> __GLIBC_FLT_EVAL_METHOD will effect the definition of float_t and
> double_t, currently we'll set __GLIBC_FLT_EVAL_METHOD to 2 when
> __FLT_EVAL_METHOD__ is -1, that means we'll define float_t and double_t
> to long double.
>
> However some target isn't natively (HW) support long double like AArch64 and
> RISC-V, they defined long double as 128-bits IEEE 754 floating point type.
>
> That means setting __GLIBC_FLT_EVAL_METHOD to 2 will cause very inefficient
> code gen for those target who didn't provide native support for long
> double, and that's violate the spirit float_t and double_t - most efficient
> types at least as wide as float and double.
>
> So this patch propose to remap __GLIBC_FLT_EVAL_METHOD to 0 rather than
> 2 when __FLT_EVAL_METHOD__ is -1, which means we'll use float/double
> rather than long double for float_t and double_t.
>
> Note: __FLT_EVAL_METHOD__ == -1 means the precision is indeterminable,
> which means compiler might using indeterminable precision during
> optimization/code gen, clang will set this value to -1 when fast
> math is enabled.
>
> Note: Default definition float_t and double_t in current glibc:
> | __GLIBC_FLT_EVAL_METHOD | float_t | double_t
> | 0 or 16 | float | double
> | 1 | double | doulbe
> | 2 | long double | long double
> More complete list see math/math.h
>
> Note: RISC-V has defined ISA extension to support 128-bits IEEE 754
> floating point operations, but only rare RISC-V core will implement that.
>
> Related link:
>
> [1] LLVM issue (__FLT_EVAL_METHOD__ is set to -1 with Ofast. #60781):
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/60781
> [2] Last version of this patch: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2023-February/145622.html
>
> Ref:
>
> [1] Definition of FLT_EVAL_METHOD from C99 spec:
> C99 Spec draft: (https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1256.pdf)
>
> Except for assignment and cast (which remove all extra range and precision), the values
> of operations with floating operands and values subject to the usual arithmetic
> conversions and of floating constants are evaluated to a format whose range and precision
> may be greater than required by the type. The use of evaluation formats is characterized
> by the implementation-defined value of FLT_EVAL_METHOD:
> 19)
>
> -1 indeterminable;
> 0 evaluate all operations and constants just to the range and precision of the
> type;
> 1 evaluate operations and constants of type float and double to the
> range and precision of the double type, evaluate long double
> operations and constants to the range and precision of the long double
> type;
> 2 evaluate all operations and constants to the range and precision of the
> long double type.
>
> All other negative values for FLT_EVAL_METHOD characterize implementation-defined
> behavior.
>
> [2] Definition of float_t and double_t in C99 spec:
>
> C99 Spec draft: (https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1256.pdf)
>
> 7.12
>
> ...
>
> The types
> float_t
> double_t
> are floating types at least as wide as float and double, respectively, and such that
> double_t is at least as wide as float_t. If FLT_EVAL_METHOD equals 0,
> float_t and double_t are float and double, respectively; if
> FLT_EVAL_METHOD equals 1, they are both double; if FLT_EVAL_METHOD equals
> 2, they are both long double; and for other values of FLT_EVAL_METHOD, they are
> otherwise implementation-defined.199)
>
> 199) The types float_t and double_t are intended to be the implementation’s most efficient types at
> least as wide as float and double, respectively. For FLT_EVAL_METHOD equal 0, 1, or 2, the
> type float_t is the narrowest type used by the implementation to
> evaluate floating expressions.
> ---
> bits/flt-eval-method.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/bits/flt-eval-method.h b/bits/flt-eval-method.h
> index 75f57b9a0e..b6be0a1e43 100644
> --- a/bits/flt-eval-method.h
> +++ b/bits/flt-eval-method.h
> @@ -26,14 +26,14 @@
> -1. */
>
> /* In the default version of this header, follow __FLT_EVAL_METHOD__.
> - -1 is mapped to 2 (considering evaluation as long double to be a
> + -1 is mapped to 0 (considering evaluation as same precision to be a
> conservatively safe assumption), and if __FLT_EVAL_METHOD__ is not
> defined then assume there is no excess precision and use the value
> 0. */
>
> #ifdef __FLT_EVAL_METHOD__
> # if __FLT_EVAL_METHOD__ == -1
> -# define __GLIBC_FLT_EVAL_METHOD 2
> +# define __GLIBC_FLT_EVAL_METHOD 0
> # else
> # define __GLIBC_FLT_EVAL_METHOD __FLT_EVAL_METHOD__
> # endif
Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com> # RISC-V
though we should have a global reviewed look at this now that it's
touching everything.
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list