[PATCH v9 0/13] implement dlmem() function

[stsp]

14.04.2023 01:02, Adhemerval Zanella Netto пишет:
> Because every time someone bring the corner cases you just dismiss saying

Compare that with corner cases brought
by Szabolcs. Have I ignored a single one?

> that either the person does not understand you [1]

So was a hope.
I didn't know it was intentional.


>   and it is up to review
> prove you are wrong;
Why do you intentionally omit the posting
where I actually provide a proof, after getting
off of an initial shock?

https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2023-March/146742.html


>   or you dismiss saying that the remarks are not
> applicable.

Yes.
The quoted remarks are not applicable.
I proved that, see above URL.
And I explicitly asked a few times, do you
need more proofs, and if so - what kind of?
Its still relevant - I can code up any proof
you want, if the above obvious proof wasn't
sufficient.
That conspiracy theory could only work if not
for Szabolcs who have started the actual
review, and not for the spec drafts that I published,
etc. After all these I was hoping you will no
longer bring that to public, but you did. :(