[PATCH] elf: Fix fences in _dl_find_object_update (bug 28745)
Florian Weimer
fweimer@redhat.com
Fri Jan 7 11:59:01 GMT 2022
* Szabolcs Nagy:
> The 01/05/2022 14:47, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> As explained in Hans Boehm, Can Seqlocks Get Along with Programming
>> Language Memory Models?, an acquire fence is needed in
>> _dlfo_read_success. The lack of a fence was
>>
>> The fence in _dlfo_mappings_begin_update has been reordered, turning
>> the fence/store sequence into a release MO store equivalent.
>>
>
> now i don't fully understand why we need the +2 then +1 trick.
>
> the writer is like
>
> v = load (&ver);
> i = v & 1;
> fence ();
> fetch_add (&ver, 2);
> update (!i);
> fence ();
> fetch_add (&ver, 1);
>
> why not
>
> v = load (&ver);
> i = v & 1;
> fence ();
> update (!i);
> fence ();
> store (&ver, v+1);
>
> i.e. i'd expect readers to only need to detect an interleaving
> "commit" operation (final store to ver). for which we need
>
> 1) updates are not visible too early (before previous commit)
> 2) updates are visible after commit.
>
> and i think two release fences can take care of this (even
> with relaxed store).
>
> i think on cppmem 1) can be modelled as
>
> int main() {
> atomic_int v=0;
> atomic_int x=0;
> {{{ {
> v.store(1,mo_relaxed); // prev commit
> atomic_thread_fence(mo_release);
> x.store(1,mo_relaxed);
> } ||| {
> v.load(mo_acquire).readsvalue(0);
> x.load(mo_relaxed).readsvalue(1);
> atomic_thread_fence(mo_acquire);
> v.load(mo_relaxed).readsvalue(0);
> } }}}
> return 0;
> }
>
> while 2) can be modelled as
>
> int main() {
> atomic_int v=0;
> atomic_int x=0;
> {{{ {
> x.store(1,mo_relaxed);
> atomic_thread_fence(mo_release);
> v.store(1,mo_relaxed);
> } ||| {
> v.load(mo_acquire).readsvalue(1);
> x.load(mo_relaxed).readsvalue(0);
> atomic_thread_fence(mo_acquire);
> v.load(mo_relaxed).readsvalue(1);
> } }}}
> return 0;
> }
I think you are right.
I want to make this change in a separate commit. The present patch
already lumps together unrelated changes (the new fence, the reordering
of one of the existing fences, and the relaxed MO loads/stores for the
TM data).
Thanks,
Florian
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list