[RFC] Supporting malloc_usable_size

DJ Delorie dj@redhat.com
Fri Dec 2 19:57:27 GMT 2022


Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@gotplt.org> writes:
> That sounds reasonable.  I wonder if the last statement could be taken 
> as a guarantee of validity up to a certain point (i.e. another call to a 
> malloc family API); should that be simply "The returned value is only 
> valid at the time of the call."?

Good point.  Agreed.



More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list