glibc build failure due to Systemtap probe change
Stefan Liebler
stli@linux.ibm.com
Tue Nov 30 11:13:51 GMT 2021
On 25/11/2021 02:55, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
> Hi, On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 at 04:47, Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha
> <libc-alpha@sourceware.org> wrote: * Stan Cox: >> Is there a way way to
> use STAP_PROBE_ASM without supplying the template? >> There's no type
> inspection in ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
> This Message Is From an External Sender
> This message came from outside your organization.
> ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 at 04:47, Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha
> <libc-alpha@sourceware.org <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>> wrote:
>
> * Stan Cox:
>
> >> Is there a way way to use STAP_PROBE_ASM without supplying the
> template?
> >> There's no type inspection in assembler, after all.
> >
> > Can you send me the failing .i file so I can experiment with it?
>
> --save-temps did not work for me for some reason, so I'm attaching -E
> and -E -fdirectives-only output.
>
> I think I got Fedora rawhide s390x building again, so it's not *very*
> time-critical, but I really don't want to release Fedora 36 with our own
> private copy of <sys/sdt.h>. But that release still some months away.
>
>
> Is there any update on this? I just ran into it with my snapshot build
> for Ubuntu. I can borrow/steal Florian's fix for now too but I too would
> prefer not to release 22.04 with it...
>
> Cheers,
> mwh
As information: This also happens on Fedora 35 with
systemtap-sdt-devel-4.6-1.fc35.
@Stan: Do you have any news with your experiments?
Bye,
Stefan
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list