[PATCH v4 2/4] posix: Do not clobber errno by atfork handlers
Adhemerval Zanella
adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org
Thu Jun 24 11:32:23 GMT 2021
On 24/06/2021 08:19, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Adhemerval Zanella:
>
>> On 24/06/2021 05:19, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>> * Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha:
>>>
>>>> Checked on x86_64-linux-gnu.
>>>> ---
>>>> posix/fork.c | 5 +++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/posix/fork.c b/posix/fork.c
>>>> index 44caf8d166..9340511198 100644
>>>> --- a/posix/fork.c
>>>> +++ b/posix/fork.c
>>>> @@ -103,6 +103,9 @@ __libc_fork (void)
>>>> }
>>>> else
>>>> {
>>>> + /* If _Fork failed, preserve its errno value. */
>>>> + int save_errno = errno;
>>>> +
>>>> /* Release acquired locks in the multi-threaded case. */
>>>> if (multiple_threads)
>>>> {
>>>> @@ -115,6 +118,8 @@ __libc_fork (void)
>>>>
>>>> /* Run the handlers registered for the parent. */
>>>> __run_fork_handlers (atfork_run_parent, multiple_threads);
>>>> +
>>>> + __set_errno (save_errno);
>>>
>>> I think you should restrict the __set_errno call to pid < 0, so that
>>> errno is not 0 after a different value has been observed by the fork
>>> handlers.
>>
>> OK, I can change it back. From the previous review iteration I understood
>> you were ok with making it unconditional [1].
>>
>> [1] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2021-March/123729.html
>
> Sorry, I meant making the saving unconditional, not the restoring.
Ok, I will fix it.
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list