values of FE_TONEAREST...

[Florian Weimer]

* Paul Zimmermann:

> I'd like to have the opinion of GNU libc developers on this, especially those
> who are also involved in Redhat Newlib:
>
> https://mailman.oakapple.net/pipermail/cfp-interest/2021-June/002038.html
>
> This was discussed in the last CFP meeting yesterday:
>
> https://mailman.oakapple.net/pipermail/cfp-interest/2021-June/002048.html

I think none of the libraries involved would want to go through the
hassle of an ABI transition.  The values have been like this for a long
time.

There are of course other sources of binary incompatibility, such as
different type sizes.

Thanks,
Florian