[PATCH] NEWS: Mention libpthread, libdl, libutil, libanl integration
Carlos O'Donell
carlos@redhat.com
Thu Jul 29 02:19:28 GMT 2021
On 7/21/21 8:08 AM, Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha wrote:
> ---
> NEWS | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
> index efc105b6b4..dd333109a5 100644
> --- a/NEWS
> +++ b/NEWS
> @@ -9,6 +9,20 @@ Version 2.34
>
> Major new features:
>
> +* All functionality formerly implemented in the libraries libpthread,
> + libdl, libutil, libanl has been integrated into libc. New
> + applications do not link with -lpthread, -ldl, -lutil, -lanl anymore.
> + For backwards compatibility, empty static archives libpthread.a,
> + libdl.a, libutil.a, libanl.a are provided, so that the linker options
> + keep working. Applications which have been linked against glibc 2.33
> + or earlier continue to load the corresponding shared objects (which
> + are now empty). The integration of those libraries into libc means
> + that additional symbols become available by default. This can cause
> + applications that contain weak references to take unexpected code
> + paths that would only have been used in previous glibc versions when
> + e.g. preloading libpthread.so.0, potentially exposing application
> + bugs.
A user reading this may wonder why we did this. There are some other NEWS
entries that need similar treatment. We should be explicit in spelling
out the reason: "improved in-place-upgrades" and result: "all libraries
merged into libc."
Suggest:
* In order to support smoother in-place-upgrades and to simplify
the implementation of the runtime all functionality formerly
implemented in the libraries libpthread, libdl, libutil, libanl
has been integrated into libc. ...
Looking forward to a v2.
> +
> * When _DYNAMIC_STACK_SIZE_SOURCE or _GNU_SOURCE are defined,
> PTHREAD_STACK_MIN is no longer constant and is redefined to
> sysconf(_SC_THREAD_STACK_MIN).
>
--
Cheers,
Carlos.
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list