[PATCH 1/3] Make libc symbols hidden in static PIE
Szabolcs Nagy
szabolcs.nagy@arm.com
Thu Jan 7 11:01:06 GMT 2021
Hidden matters with static PIE: extern symbol access in position
independent code usually involves GOT indirections which needs
RELATIVE relocs in a static linked PIE. Using So hidden avoids
indirections and RELATIVE relocs on targets that can access symbols
pc-relative.
The check should use IS_IN_LIB instead of IS_IN(libc) since all
static libraries can use hidden visibility to avoid indirections,
however the test system links objects from libcrypt.a into dynamic
linked test binaries so hidden does not work there. I think mixing
static and shared libc components in the same binary should not be
supported usage, but to be safe only use hidden in libc.a.
>From -static-pie linked 'int main(){}' this shaves off 73 relative
relocs on aarch64 and reduces code size too.
---
include/libc-symbols.h | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/libc-symbols.h b/include/libc-symbols.h
index ea126ae70c..93e63ee889 100644
--- a/include/libc-symbols.h
+++ b/include/libc-symbols.h
@@ -434,13 +434,17 @@ for linking")
strong_alias(real, name)
#endif
-#if defined SHARED || defined LIBC_NONSHARED \
- || (BUILD_PIE_DEFAULT && IS_IN (libc))
+#if defined SHARED || defined LIBC_NONSHARED
# define attribute_hidden __attribute__ ((visibility ("hidden")))
#else
# define attribute_hidden
#endif
+/* Mark all symbols hidden in static PIE libc to avoid GOT indirections. */
+#if BUILD_PIE_DEFAULT && IS_IN (libc) && !defined LIBC_NONSHARED
+# pragma GCC visibility push(hidden)
+#endif
+
#define attribute_tls_model_ie __attribute__ ((tls_model ("initial-exec")))
#define attribute_relro __attribute__ ((section (".data.rel.ro")))
--
2.17.1
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list