[PATCH] Build libc-start with stack protector for SHARED
Florian Weimer
fweimer@redhat.com
Wed Feb 3 13:48:44 GMT 2021
* Siddhesh Poyarekar:
> On 2/3/21 3:02 PM, Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha wrote:
>> Would it be cleaner to split the shared and static __libc_start_main
>> implementations into different files? There isn't that much overlap
>> between the two.
>
> The makefile twiddling might become a bit more tedious because it
> won't be just a case of .o vs .os. However it's tempting because
> it'll simplify the macro soup in there quite significantly. I'll give
> it a shot, but can I do it independently of this change?
Sure, I was just wondering aloud, sorry.
Thanks,
Florian
--
Red Hat GmbH, https://de.redhat.com/ , Registered seat: Grasbrunn,
Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243,
Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Brian Klemm, Laurie Krebs, Michael O'Neill
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list