[PATCH] fix create thread failed in unprivileged process [BZ #28287]

Hongxu Jia hongxu.jia@windriver.com
Sun Aug 29 14:12:30 GMT 2021


On 8/29/21 9:47 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address]
>
> On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 6:29 AM Hongxu Jia <hongxu.jia@windriver.com> wrote:
>> Since commit [d8ea0d0168 Add an internal wrapper for clone, clone2 and clone3]
>> applied, start a unprivileged container (docker run without --privileged),
>> it creates a thread failed in container.
>>
>> In commit d8ea0d0168, it calls __clone3 if HAVE_CLONE3_WAPPER is defined.  If
>> __clone3 returns -1 with ENOSYS, fall back to clone or clone2.
>>
>> As known from [1], cloneXXX fails with EPERM if CLONE_NEWCGROUP,
>> CLONE_NEWIPC, CLONE_NEWNET, CLONE_NEWNS, CLONE_NEWPID, or CLONE_NEWUTS
>> was specified by an unprivileged process (process without CAP_SYS_ADMIN)
> I don't think the description is accurate.  In your test, none
> of the mentioned flags are used directly.  The real bug is
> that the container you used blocks the normal clone3 and
> sets errno to EPERM.  The question is if/how glibc should
> work arounds the clone3 bug in containers.   We want to add
> a public clone3 wrapper to glibc in the future.  But before we
> do that, all these containers should be changed to ENOSYS
> if clone3 is blocked.

You mean I should fix the container (here is the docker I used) to correct

EPERM to ENOSYS in this situation, but for the released/old docker,

the pthread_create still does not work with glibc 2.34 in unprivileged mode.

In other word, should the new glibc consider backward compatibility with 
others?

//Hongxu

>> [1] https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/clone3.2.html
>>
>> So if __clone3 returns -1 with EPERM, fall back to clone or clone2 could
>> fix the issue. Here are the test steps:
>>
>> 1) Prepare test code
>> cat > conftest.c <<ENDOF
>>   #include <pthread.h>
>>   #include <stdio.h>
>>
>> int check_me = 0;
>> void* func(void* data) {check_me = 42; printf("start thread: check_me %d\n", check_me); return &check_me;}
>> int main()
>> {
>>    pthread_t t;
>>    void *ret;
>>    pthread_create (&t, 0, func, 0);
>>    pthread_join (t, &ret);
>>    printf("check_me %d, p %p\n", check_me, &ret);
>>    return (check_me != 42 || ret != &check_me);
>> }
>>
>> ENDOF
>>
>> 2) Compile
>> gcc -o conftest -pthread conftest.c
>>
>> 3) Start a container with glibc 2.34 installed
>> [skip details]
>> docker run -it <container-image-name> bash
>>
>> 4) Run conftest without this patch
>> $ ./conftest
>> check_me 0, p 0x7ffd91ccd400
>>
>> 5) Run conftest with this patch
>> $ ./conftest
>> start thread: check_me 42
>> check_me 42, p 0x7ffe253c6f20
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hongxu Jia <hongxu.jia@windriver.com>
>> ---
>>   sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/clone-internal.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/clone-internal.c b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/clone-internal.c
>> index 979f7880be..97101994e8 100644
>> --- a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/clone-internal.c
>> +++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/clone-internal.c
>> @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ __clone_internal (struct clone_args *cl_args,
>>     /* Try clone3 first.  */
>>     int saved_errno = errno;
>>     ret = __clone3 (cl_args, sizeof (*cl_args), func, arg);
>> -  if (ret != -1 || errno != ENOSYS)
>> +  if (ret != -1 || (errno != ENOSYS && errno != EPERM))
>>       return ret;
>>
>>     /* NB: Restore errno since errno may be checked against non-zero
>> --
>> 2.30.2
>>
>
> --
> H.J.




More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list