[PATCH] Fixed inaccuracy of j0f (BZ #28185)

[Paul Zimmermann]

thank you Joseph. I will submit a new patch with lines like:

j0 0x1.31ec02p+1 xfail:binary64 xfail:intel96 xfail:binary128

Paul

> Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2021 17:36:45 +0000
> From: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
> 
> On Wed, 4 Aug 2021, Paul Zimmermann wrote:
> 
> > Would it make sense to add just one entry (the one with the largest error)
> > with xfail-rounding:double,float128,float32x,float64,float64x,ldouble?
> 
> xfail-rounding is only if the problems are only in non-default rounding 
> modes, if there are large errors in round-to-nearest you should use xfail 
> (and note that the arguments are the format names as used by 
> gen-auto-libm-tests, e.g. binary64, not the names used in the testcase 
> names).
> 
> -- 
> Joseph S. Myers
> joseph@codesourcery.com