Expose 'array_length()' macro in <sys/cdefs.h> or <sys/param.h>
Alejandro Colomar
colomar.6.4.3@gmail.com
Mon Sep 21 12:47:51 GMT 2020
[[ CC += libc-coord at lists.openwall.com ]]
On 2020-09-21 12:33, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Alejandro Colomar:
>
>> [[
>> CC += libc-coord at sourceware.org
>> CC += gcc at gcc.gnu.org
>> CC += libstdc++ at gcc.gnu.org
>> ]]
>>
>> Hi Florian,
>>
>> On 2020-09-21 10:38, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>> * Alejandro Colomar via Libc-alpha:
>>>
>>>> I'd like to propose exposing the macro 'array_length()' as defined in
>>>> 'include/array_length.h' to the user.
>>>
>>> It would need a good C++ port, probably one for C++98 and another one
>>> for C++14 or later.
>>
>> For C++, I use the following definition:
>>
>>
>> #include <cassert>
>> #include <sys/cdefs.h>
>> #include <type_traits>
>>
>>
>> #define is_array__(a) (std::is_array <__typeof__(a)>::value)
>
> Should be decltype.
Thanks.
>
>> However, there are a few problems:
>>
>> 1) This doesn't work for VLAs (GNU extension).
>> I couldn't find a way to do it. Maybe I should file a bug in GCC.
>
> I do not think VLA support is critical. C++ programmers will be used to
> limited support in utility functions.
>
>> 2) Also, this requires C++11; I don't know how to do it for older C++.
>> Again, support from the compiler would be great.
>
> I think limited C++98 support is possible using a function template,
> where the array length N is a template parameter. To enable use in
> constant expressions, you can return a type of char[N], and the macro
> wrapper should then apply sizeof to the function result.
Sorry, I don't know much C++, and I don't know how to do this.
>
>> 3) The macro can't be used in the same places as the C version,
>> because of the `({})`.
>> The `0 * sizeof(struct{...})` trick doesn't work in C++ due to:
>> error: types may not be defined in 'sizeof' expressions
>
> For C++11, you can use a constexpr function instead of a macro.
>
> array_length should not be a macro in current C++ modes, so that we
> retain compatibility if a future C++ standard adds array_length (or
> nitems) on its own. This is not a concern for legacy C++98 mode.
See above.
>
>>> Maybe also ask on the libc-coord list.
>>
>> Ok. Added CCs.
>
> libc-coord is not hosted on sourceware:
>
> <https://www.openwall.com/lists/libc-coord/2020/01/30/1>
>
> The discussion here veered off into C++ territory anyway.
I added the correct list now.
>
> Thanks,
> Florian
>
Thanks,
Alex.
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list