PING: V7 [PATCH] sysconf: Add _SC_MINSIGSTKSZ/_SC_SIGSTKSZ [BZ #20305]

H.J. Lu hjl.tools@gmail.com
Wed Nov 18 15:17:10 GMT 2020


On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 7:13 AM Zack Weinberg <zackw@panix.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 9:40 AM H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 6:26 AM Zack Weinberg <zackw@panix.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 9:14 AM H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha
> > > <libc-alpha@sourceware.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > If there are no more comments, I will check in it together with
> > > >
> > > > https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2020-October/118707.html
> > > >
> > > > on Friday, Nov 20.
> > >
> > > I don't think you have consensus for this ABI-breaking change, and I
> > > *certainly* don't think you should check it in without positive
> > > agreement from at least one other person.
> > >
> >
> > My patch adds _SC_SIGSTKSZ_SOURCE.   There are no changes
> > unless _SC_SIGSTKSZ_SOURCE is defined.
>
> OK, but do we have consensus on adding a new _*_SOURCE macro and a new
> sysconf parameter ahead of their adoption by POSIX?  This is not a

This is what Dave and I came up with.  This approach doesn't change ABI
unless it is requested by developers.

> rhetorical question, I have not been following that part of the
> discussion closely enough to tell.
>
> zw



-- 
H.J.


More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list