[PATCH] nanosleep: Pass NULL when rem == NULL on ports with __TIMESIZE != 64
Adhemerval Zanella
adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org
Thu Nov 12 14:35:25 GMT 2020
On 12/11/2020 11:25, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> On ports with __TIMESIZE != 64 the remaining time argument always receives
> pointer to struct __timespec64 instance. This is the different behavior
> when compared to 64 bit versions of clock_nanosleep and nanosleep
> functions, which receive NULL.
>
> To avoid any potential issues, we also pass NULL when *rem pointer is
> NULL.
>
> Reported-by: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
LGTM, thanks.
> ---
> sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/clock_nanosleep.c | 3 ++-
> sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/nanosleep.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/clock_nanosleep.c b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/clock_nanosleep.c
> index 6ad3321435..82cd11a564 100644
> --- a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/clock_nanosleep.c
> +++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/clock_nanosleep.c
> @@ -78,7 +78,8 @@ __clock_nanosleep (clockid_t clock_id, int flags, const struct timespec *req,
> struct __timespec64 treq64, trem64;
>
> treq64 = valid_timespec_to_timespec64 (*req);
> - r = __clock_nanosleep_time64 (clock_id, flags, &treq64, &trem64);
> + r = __clock_nanosleep_time64 (clock_id, flags, &treq64,
> + rem != NULL ? &trem64 : NULL);
>
> if (r == EINTR && rem != NULL && (flags & TIMER_ABSTIME) == 0)
> *rem = valid_timespec64_to_timespec (trem64);
Ok.
> diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/nanosleep.c b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/nanosleep.c
> index 8f4ee0f744..e58815c4d0 100644
> --- a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/nanosleep.c
> +++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/nanosleep.c
> @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ __nanosleep (const struct timespec *req, struct timespec *rem)
> struct __timespec64 treq64, trem64;
>
> treq64 = valid_timespec_to_timespec64 (*req);
> - int ret = __nanosleep64 (&treq64, &trem64);
> + int ret = __nanosleep64 (&treq64, rem != NULL ? &trem64 : NULL);
>
> if (ret != 0 && errno == EINTR && rem != NULL)
> *rem = valid_timespec64_to_timespec (trem64);
>
Ok.
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list