[PATCH] nscd: bump GC cycle during cache pruning (bug 26130)
Mon Jun 29 14:09:28 GMT 2020
On Jun 29 2020, Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha wrote:
> * Andreas Schwab:
>> On Jun 29 2020, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>> I think this needs barriers after and before the increments.
>> Why doesn't gc need those barriers?
> I think it needs them as well. I thought we had them there. 8-(
Should they use atomic_increment?
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, email@example.com
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
More information about the Libc-alpha