[PATCH 1/3] glibc: Perform rseq registration at C startup and thread creation (v21)
Wed Jun 24 19:16:38 GMT 2020
----- On Jun 24, 2020, at 3:11 PM, Florian Weimer email@example.com wrote:
> * Mathieu Desnoyers:
>>> I'm still worried that __rseq_static_assert and __rseq_alignof will show
>>> up in the UAPI with textually different definitions. (This does not
>>> apply to __rseq_tls_model_ie.)
>> What makes this worry not apply to __rseq_tls_model_ie ?
> It's not needed by the kernel header because it doesn't contain a
> __rseq_abi declaration.
>>> Is my worry unfounded?
>> So AFAIU you worry that eventually sys/rseq.h and linux/rseq.h carry different
>> definitions of __rseq_static_assert and __rseq_alignof.
>> Indeed, I did not surround those #define with #ifndef/#endif. Maybe we should ?
>> Just in case the definitions end up being different (worse case scenario), we
>> should expect their behavior to be pretty much equivalent. So going for the
>> following should address your concern I think:
> I think we should keep things simple on the glibc side for now and do
> this changes to the kernel headers first.
Just to be sure I understand what you mean by "keep things simple", do you
recommend removing the following lines completely for now from sys/rseq.h ?
/* Ensure the compiler supports rseq_align. */
__rseq_static_assert (__rseq_alignof (struct rseq_cs) >= 32, "alignment");
__rseq_static_assert (__rseq_alignof (struct rseq) >= 32, "alignment");
More information about the Libc-alpha