[PATCH 0/7] RFC Memory tagging support
DJ Delorie
dj@redhat.com
Mon Jun 15 17:04:55 GMT 2020
Two immediate thoughts...
1. Do we really want to add more environment variables as aliases for
new tunables? I thought env support was for pre-tunable variable
support (compatibility) only.
2. Do we really need to lose the back pointer's word in allocated
memory? Historically, the back pointer is *not* part of the malloc
internal data when the chunk is in 'allocated' state, and losing that
memory will make small allocations much less efficient.
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list