ABI changes still pending for glibc 2.32?
Carlos O'Donell
carlos@redhat.com
Fri Jul 10 20:39:22 GMT 2020
On 7/10/20 8:59 AM, Andreas K. Hüttel wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 8. Juli 2020, 22:56:12 EEST schrieb Carlos O'Donell:
>>
>> The first report of the bug I saw was filed 2020-05-03:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830623
>>
>
>>
>> This is your choice. I don't call it "silly" because it's a real bug and an
>> adjustment to locale data to better suit those using _DATE_FMT via
>> _nl_langinfo().
>>
>
> Yeah there was maybe my non-US bias involved.
>
> We did get some report on it, but I discarded that because I saw the change as
> obvious cleanup (on the same level as the regular header fixing, "well it
> breaks something but we'll have to do it one day").
>
> Then again, in a wider sense from that perspective probably "going metric"
> would also be a valid bug fix... :D
We have to ask our users :-)
> Anyway, looking forward to 2.32 and thanks for your work!
Thank you. I take it this means you are OK with the plan going forward.
I have review from Florian so I'll probably push the en_US fix next
week and give Rafal or Mike time to comment.
--
Cheers,
Carlos.
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list