[PATCH v6] string: Adds tests for test-strncasecmp and test-strncpy
Raphael M Zinsly
rzinsly@linux.ibm.com
Fri Jul 10 14:21:54 GMT 2020
On 10/07/2020 10:56, Lucas A. M. Magalhaes wrote:
> Hi Raphael,
> Thanks fo the patch.
>
> Quoting Raphael Moreira Zinsly (2020-07-08 17:20:09)
>> Changes since v5:
>> string/test-strncpy.c:
>> - Adjusted s1 and s2 placements.
>> - Used the same pattern as test-strncasecmp.
>>
>> --- >8 ---
>>
>> Adds tests to check if strings placed at page bondaries are
>> handled correctly by strncasecmp and strncpy similar to tests
>> for strncmp and strnlen.
>> ---
>> string/test-strncasecmp.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> string/test-strncpy.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 80 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/string/test-strncasecmp.c b/string/test-strncasecmp.c
>> index 6a9c27beae..628135b962 100644
>> --- a/string/test-strncasecmp.c
>> +++ b/string/test-strncasecmp.c
>> @@ -137,6 +137,49 @@ do_test (size_t align1, size_t align2, size_t n, size_t len, int max_char,
>> do_one_test (impl, s1, s2, n, exp_result);
>> }
>>
>> +static void
>> +do_page_tests (void)
>> +{
>> + char *s1, *s2;
>> + int exp_result;
>> + /* Assumes up to 512-bit wide read/stores. */
>> + const size_t maxoffset = 64;
>> +
>> + s1 = (char *) buf1 + (BUF1PAGES) * page_size - maxoffset;
>> + memset (s1, 'a', maxoffset - 1);
>> + s1[maxoffset - 1] = '\0';
>
> OK.
>> +
>> + s2 = (char *) buf2 + page_size - maxoffset;
>> + memset (s2, 'a', maxoffset - 1);
>> + s2[maxoffset - 1] = '\0';
>> +
> OK. buf2 is only 1 page size.
>
>> + /* At this point s1 and s2 points to distinct memory regions containing
>> + "aa..." with size of 63 plus '\0'. Also, both strings are bounded to a
>> + page with write/read access and the next page is protected with PROT_NONE
>> + (meaning that any access outside of the page regions will trigger an
>> + invalid memory access).
>> +
>> + The loop checks for all possible offset up to maxoffset for both
>> + inputs with a size larger than the string (so memory access outside
>> + the expected memory regions might trigger invalid access). */
>> +
>> + for (size_t off1 = 0; off1 < maxoffset; off1++)
>> + {
>> + for (size_t off2 = 0; off2 < maxoffset; off2++)
>> + {
>> + exp_result = off1 == off2
>> + ? 0
>> + : off1 < off2
>> + ? 'a'
>> + : -'a';
>> +
>> + FOR_EACH_IMPL (impl, 0)
>> + check_result (impl, s1 + off1, s2 + off2, maxoffset + 1,
>> + exp_result);
>> + }
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>
> OK.
>> static void
>> do_random_tests (void)
>> {
>> @@ -334,6 +377,7 @@ test_locale (const char *locale)
>> }
>>
>> do_random_tests ();
>> + do_page_tests ();
>> }
>>
>
> OK.
>> int
>> diff --git a/string/test-strncpy.c b/string/test-strncpy.c
>> index c978753ad8..c8d4ad58a6 100644
>> --- a/string/test-strncpy.c
>> +++ b/string/test-strncpy.c
>> @@ -155,6 +155,41 @@ do_test (size_t align1, size_t align2, size_t len, size_t n, int max_char)
>> do_one_test (impl, s2, s1, len, n);
>> }
>>
>> +static void
>> +do_page_tests (void)
>> +{
>> + CHAR *s1, *s2;
>> + /* Assumes up to 512-bit wide read/stores. */
>> + const size_t maxoffset = 64;
>> +
>> + /* Put s1 at the edge of buf1's last page. */
>> + s1 = (CHAR *) buf1 + (BUF1PAGES) * (page_size / sizeof(CHAR)) - maxoffset;
>> + /* Put s2 almost at the edge of buf2, it needs room to put a string with
>> + size of maxoffset + 1 at s2 + maxoffset. */
>> + s2 = (CHAR *) buf2 + (page_size / sizeof(CHAR)) - (maxoffset + 1) * 2;
>> +
>
> IDK if was the intention. If you add maxoffset to s2 it will still leave
> maxoffset + 2 bytes for s2 and not maxoffset as the comment says.
>
That's right, leaving the + 1 was a mistake. Thanks for catching it!
>> + MEMSET (s1, 'a', maxoffset - 1);
>> + s1[maxoffset - 1] = '\0';
>> +
>
> OK.
>
>> + /* Both strings are bounded to a page with write/read access and the next
>> + page is protected with PROT_NONE (meaning that any access outside of the
>> + page regions will trigger an invalid memory access).
>> +
>> + The loop copies the string s1 for all possible offset up to maxoffset
>> + for both inputs with a size larger than s1 (so memory access outside the
>> + expected memory regions might trigger invalid access). */
>> +
>> + for (size_t off1 = 0; off1 < maxoffset; off1++)
>> + {
>> + for (size_t off2 = 0; off2 < maxoffset; off2++)
>> + {
>> + FOR_EACH_IMPL (impl, 0)
>> + do_one_test (impl, (s2 + off2), (s1 + off1), maxoffset - off1 - 1,
>> + maxoffset + 1);
>
> maxoffset + 2?
>> + }
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> static void
>> do_random_tests (void)
>> {
>> @@ -317,6 +352,7 @@ test_main (void)
>> }
>>
>> do_random_tests ();
>> + do_page_tests ();
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>
> OK.
>> --
>> 2.26.2
>>
Best Regards,
--
Raphael Moreira Zinsly
IBM
Linux on Power Toolchain
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list