[PATCH v2] stdlib: realpath use malloc replace __alloca to reduce stack overflow risks [BZ #26341]
Adhemerval Zanella
adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org
Fri Aug 7 19:43:12 GMT 2020
On 07/08/2020 07:16, Xiaoming Ni wrote:
> Realpath() cyclically invokes __alloca() when processing soft link files,
> which may consume 164 KB stack space.
> Therefore, replace __alloca with malloc to reduce stack overflow risks
>
> v2: Avoid repeated malloc and free operations. and add testcase
> v1: https://patches-gcc.linaro.org/patch/39851/
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiaoming Ni <nixiaoming@huawei.com>
Again, we do not use DCO, but rather Copyright assignment.
Paul, it might be something to be fixed on gnulib since I noted that both
gpl and lgpl code uses malloca (which calls alloca if the header is present).
Some comments below regarding testing.
> ---
> stdlib/Makefile | 3 +-
> stdlib/canonicalize.c | 25 +++++++++++++--
> stdlib/tst-bz26341.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 stdlib/tst-bz26341.c
>
> diff --git a/stdlib/Makefile b/stdlib/Makefile
> index 4615f6dfe7..bfdd9036b1 100644
> --- a/stdlib/Makefile
> +++ b/stdlib/Makefile
> @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ tests := tst-strtol tst-strtod testmb testrand testsort testdiv \
> tst-makecontext-align test-bz22786 tst-strtod-nan-sign \
> tst-swapcontext1 tst-setcontext4 tst-setcontext5 \
> tst-setcontext6 tst-setcontext7 tst-setcontext8 \
> - tst-setcontext9 tst-bz20544
> + tst-setcontext9 tst-bz20544 tst-bz26341
>
> tests-internal := tst-strtod1i tst-strtod3 tst-strtod4 tst-strtod5i \
> tst-tls-atexit tst-tls-atexit-nodelete
Ok.
> @@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ ifeq ($(build-hardcoded-path-in-tests),yes)
> tests += tst-empty-env
> endif
>
> +LDLIBS-tst-bz26341 = -lpthread
This needs to be $(shared-thread-library).
> LDLIBS-test-atexit-race = $(shared-thread-library)
> LDLIBS-test-at_quick_exit-race = $(shared-thread-library)
> LDLIBS-test-cxa_atexit-race = $(shared-thread-library)
> diff --git a/stdlib/canonicalize.c b/stdlib/canonicalize.c
> index cbd885a3c5..c02a8a5800 100644
> --- a/stdlib/canonicalize.c
> +++ b/stdlib/canonicalize.c
> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ __realpath (const char *name, char *resolved)
> const char *start, *end, *rpath_limit;
> long int path_max;
> int num_links = 0;
> + char *buf = NULL;
>
> if (name == NULL)
> {
Ok.
> @@ -163,9 +164,18 @@ __realpath (const char *name, char *resolved)
>
> if (S_ISLNK (st.st_mode))
> {
> - char *buf = __alloca (path_max);
> size_t len;
>
> + if (buf == NULL)
> + {
> + buf = malloc (path_max);
> + if (buf == NULL)
> + {
> + __set_errno (ENOMEM);
> + goto error;
> + }
> + }
> +
> if (++num_links > __eloop_threshold ())
> {
> __set_errno (ELOOP);
Ok.
> @@ -178,7 +188,14 @@ __realpath (const char *name, char *resolved)
> buf[n] = '\0';
>
> if (!extra_buf)
> - extra_buf = __alloca (path_max);
> + {
> + extra_buf = malloc (path_max);
> + if (extra_buf == NULL)
> + {
> + __set_errno (ENOMEM);
> + goto error;
> + }
> + }
>
> len = strlen (end);
> if (path_max - n <= len)
Ok.
> @@ -210,12 +227,16 @@ __realpath (const char *name, char *resolved)
> *dest = '\0';
>
> assert (resolved == NULL || resolved == rpath);
> + free(extra_buf);
> + free(buf);
> return rpath;
>
> error:
> assert (resolved == NULL || resolved == rpath);
> if (resolved == NULL)
> free (rpath);
> + free (extra_buf);
> + free (buf);
> return NULL;
> }
> libc_hidden_def (__realpath)
Ok.
> diff --git a/stdlib/tst-bz26341.c b/stdlib/tst-bz26341.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..0fe095b7d1
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/stdlib/tst-bz26341.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
This test need the Copyright header and to be properly indented using glibc
code guideline.
Use it need to use the libsupport (check support/README-testing.c and other
tests that use '#include <support/test-driver.c>'.
> +#include <stdlib.h>
> +#include <stdio.h>
> +#include <unistd.h>
> +#include <limits.h>
> +#include <sys/resource.h>
> +#include <sys/stat.h>
> +#include <fcntl.h>
> +#include <string.h>
> +#include <pthread.h>
> +
> +int creat_link(void)
> +{
> + int i;
> + int fd;
> + char fname[2][16] = {0};
> + char *p1 = fname[0];
> + char *p2 = fname[1];
> + strcpy(p1, "f0");
> + fd = open(p1, O_RDONLY|O_CREAT, 0444);
> + close(fd);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < 41; i++) {
> + sprintf(p2, "f%d", i);
> + symlink(p1, p2);
> + p1 = p2;
> + p2 = fname[i % 2];
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +void clean_link(void)
> +{
> + char fname[16] = {0};
> + int i;
> + for (i = 0; i < 41; i++) {
> + sprintf(fname, "f%d", i);
> + unlink(fname);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +void *do_realpath(void *ignore)
> +{
> + char *p = realpath("f40", NULL);
> + printf("%p\n", p);
> + if (p != NULL)
> + printf("%s\n", p);
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +/* Set different stack sizes and check whether stack overflow occurs. */
> +int do_test(int size)
> +{
> + pthread_t tid;
> + pthread_attr_t thread_attr;
> + pthread_attr_init(&thread_attr);
> + pthread_attr_setstacksize(&thread_attr, size);
> +
> + pthread_create(&tid, &thread_attr, do_realpath, NULL);
> + pthread_join(tid, NULL);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> +{
> + creat_link();
> + do_test(8192*1024);
> + do_test(160*1024);
> + do_test(40*1024);
It think it would be suffice to just check with a small stacksize that triggers
the failure on current code.
> + clean_link();
> + printf("\n");
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
>
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list