Ping. Re: [PATCH 0/6] IEEE long double printf and friends for powerpc64le

[Gabriel F. T. Gomes]

Any comments on these patches?

I believe I have addressed all the comments in previous submissions.

On Fri, 09 Aug 2019, Gabriel F. T. Gomes wrote:

>From: "Gabriel F. T. Gomes" <gabrielftg@linux.ibm.com>
>
>A long time ago [1], I sent a patch set with the initial implementations
>of many string to/from IEEE long double conversion routines for
>powerpc64le.  The patch set depended on other, at the time unapplied,
>patch sets [2,3], which are now all integrated into master.  Even though
>this dependency existed, I got a lot of feedback (thanks, btw), which I
>tried to address for this new round.
>
>In this thread, I only included printf and friends functions, which
>helps reduce the size of the patch set and maybe ease review. :)
>
>As with previous submissions, these changes can only be tested once all
>other functions have actually been integrated (because the function
>redirections in our installed headers are macroized and work for all
>long double routines).  So, in order to test it, I use a more complete
>branch, which I made available at:
>https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/gabriel/powerpc-ieee128-printscan
>
>[1] https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2018-06/msg00652.html
>[2] https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2018-10/msg00612.html
>[3] https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2019-02/msg00582.html
>
>Gabriel F. T. Gomes (6):
>  ldbl-128ibm-compat: Add regular character printing functions
>  ldbl-128ibm-compat: Add wide character printing functions
>  ldbl-128ibm-compat: Add regular character, fortified printing
>    functions
>  ldbl-128ibm-compat: Add wide character, fortified printing functions
>  ldbl-128ibm-compat: Test double values
>  ldbl-128ibm-compat: Test positional arguments