[review v2] Clarify purpose of assert in _dl_lookup_symbol_x
Florian Weimer (Code Review)
gerrit@gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io
Tue Nov 12 12:52:00 GMT 2019
Florian Weimer has posted comments on this change.
Change URL: https://gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io/r/c/glibc/+/469
......................................................................
Patch Set 2:
(1 comment)
I've added you to the glibc-maintainers group, so you can give +2 now as well.
(I'm not sure if we can keep up the practice of adding Reviewed-By: lines with Gerrit, because doing so creates a new patch version that needs review.)
| --- elf/dl-lookup.c
| +++ elf/dl-lookup.c
| @@ -793,16 +793,14 @@ _dl_lookup_symbol_x (const char *undef_name, struct link_map *undef_map,
| bump_num_relocations ();
|
| - /* No other flag than DL_LOOKUP_ADD_DEPENDENCY or DL_LOOKUP_GSCOPE_LOCK
| - is allowed if we look up a versioned symbol. */
| - assert (version == NULL
| - || (flags & ~(DL_LOOKUP_ADD_DEPENDENCY | DL_LOOKUP_GSCOPE_LOCK))
| - == 0);
| + /* DL_LOOKUP_RETURN_NEWEST does not make sense for versioned
| + lookups. */
| + assert (version == NULL || !(flags & DL_LOOKUP_RETURN_NEWEST));
PS1, Line 797:
Indeed. (You can mark comments as not requiring a reply by marking
them as Resolved.)
|
| size_t i = 0;
| if (__glibc_unlikely (skip_map != NULL))
| /* Search the relevant loaded objects for a definition. */
| while ((*scope)->r_list[i] != skip_map)
| ++i;
|
| /* Search the relevant loaded objects for a definition. */
| for (size_t start = i; *scope != NULL; start = 0, ++scope)
--
Gerrit-Project: glibc
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I3384349cef90cfd91862ebc34a4053f0c0a99404
Gerrit-Change-Number: 469
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Gabriel F. T. Gomes <gabriel@inconstante.net.br>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 12:52:18 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Gabriel F. T. Gomes <gabriel@inconstante.net.br>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list