[PATCH v2 06/30] ldbl-128ibm-compat: Test positional arguments

[Paul E Murphy]

On 10/25/19 10:33 AM, Gabriel F. T. Gomes wrote:
> From: "Gabriel F. T. Gomes" <gabrielftg@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> No changes since v1.
> 
> -- 8< --
> The format string can request positional parameters, instead of relying
> on the order in which they appear as arguments.  Since this has an
> effect on how the type of each argument is determined, this patch
> extends the test cases to use positional parameters with mixed double
> and long double types, to verify that the IEEE long double
> implementations of *printf work correctly in this scenario.
> 
> Tested for powerpc64le.

OK. Are there any other weird cases which should be tested against? Are 
these meant to be implicit tests of the underlying ABI?