[RFC 7/7] y2038: Introduce support for clock_settime() being Y2038 safe

[Joseph Myers]

On Wed, 27 Mar 2019, Lukasz Majewski wrote:

> +/* For Y2038 safe system the __clock_settime64 needs to be a visible
> +   symbol as a replacement for Y2038 unsafe clock_settime()
> +*/

Do not use () after a function name to indicate it's a function; see the 
GNU Coding Standards.  This applies to other comments in this patch series 
as well.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com