glibc 2.30 - 6 days until ABI freeze.

[Adhemerval Zanella]

On 12/07/2019 00:41, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On 7/10/19 4:22 PM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 09/07/2019 15:04, Mike Crowe wrote:
>>> On Friday 05 July 2019 at 16:38:37 +0100, Mike Crowe wrote:
>>>> On Thursday 04 July 2019 at 16:41:27 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>>>> * Adhemerval Zanella:
>>>>>
>>>>>> My take initial take was to add _np, but after a chat with Joseph's on
>>>>>> IRC I think we should add them as expected names.  Florian has raised
>>>>>> some concerns.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please feel free to disregard what I said if Joseph has a different
>>>>> opinion.
>>>>
>>>> Adhemerval, does that mean we have consensus to use the unadorned names or
>>>> do we need more people to comment?
>>>
>>> In addition, if the consensus is that the functions should be added with
>>> the _np suffixes then would it be better to do that in a single new patch
>>> or to modify each of the existing (but already reviewed) patches? I had a
>>> go at modifying the individual patches to be prepared and the abilist
>>> files cause a lot of conflicts when a function is renamed. :(
>>
>> I think unadorned should be simpler and should generated less trouble.
> 
> I am OK with the unadorned names.
> Â 
>> Carlos, do I have an 'ok' to push it on master?
> Â 
> Yes, please push to master. I'd like to see this land.

Done, thanks for following this up.

> 
> I'm going to hard-freeze next week.
> 
> Sorry for my delayed responses.
>