Japanese Era name change and named vs. numbered era date.
Carlos O'Donell
carlos@redhat.com
Tue Jan 29 18:33:00 GMT 2019
TAMUKI-san,
Is it important to describe the first era year as "å
"
versus "1"? Or to allow the user to control this?
This particular issue was raised as a Java issue, where
"Gy" via DateTimeFormatter can print [Era name][Era year],
but does so with [Era year] as a number (arabic numeral).
I don't know how you would implement such an alternative
because it would require enumerating all of the possible
non-arabic-numeral alternatives. It would be an interesting
addition, but I'm not sure it is valuable to do it this way.
Thoughts?
--
Cheers,
Carlos.
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list