[PATCH 0/8] x86-64: Properly handle the length parameter [BZ# 24097]

Florian Weimer fweimer@redhat.com
Fri Jan 18 20:15:00 GMT 2019


* Florian Weimer:

> * H. J. Lu:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 2:50 AM Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> * H. J. Lu:
>>>
>>> > On x32, the size_t parameter may be passed in the lower 32 bits of a
>>> > 64-bit register with the non-zero upper 32 bits.  The string/memory
>>> > functions written in assembly can only use the lower 32 bits of a
>>> > 64-bit register as length or must clear the upper 32 bits before using
>>> > the full 64-bit register for length.
>>> >
>>> > This pach fixes string/memory functions written in assembly for x32.
>>> > Tested on x86-64 and x32.  On x86-64, libc.so is the same with and
>>> > withou the fix.
>>>
>>> Can this bug result in buffer overflows?  Should we obtain a CVE
>>
>> Yes, definitely.
>>
>>> identifier?
>>>
>>
>> Yes, please.  Can you do that for me?
>
> Done, MITRE gave us CVE-2019-6488.  Please reference this in the
> ChangeLog and the commit message if you have not done so.  Please also
> add short NEWS entry in the security section.  Thanks.

I should clarify that I have not reviewed the actual patches.

Thanks,
Florian



More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list