[PATCH] Add XFAIL_ROUNDING_IBM128_LIBGCC to more fma() tests
Joseph Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com
Tue Jan 15 20:53:00 GMT 2019
On Tue, 15 Jan 2019, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho wrote:
> Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> writes:
>
> > On Mon, 14 Jan 2019, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho wrote:
> >
> >> Contrary to what I had thought: this is indeed caused by spurious
> >> overflows from libgcc (confirmed with the patch applied to libgcc).
> >> We can suppress the all errors with XFAIL_ROUNDING_IBM128_LIBGCC.
> >
> > In that case - if it's only an issue in non-default rounding modes - this
> > patch is OK.
>
> They appear only when rounding upward and downward.
>
> Pushed as ecdacd34a2ac3b6d5a529ff218b29261d9d98a7a.
Will you be closing bug 23584 (given the conclusion it's actually a libgcc
issue, addressed via the XFAILing, not a glibc bug)?
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list