[PATCH v5 1/5] strftime: Add missing uses of L_ macro, etc. [BZ #23758]

[Siddhesh Poyarekar]

On 09/01/19 3:32 PM, Rafal Luzynski wrote:
> Hello Tamuki Shoichi,
> 
> Thank you for the next version of your patches.
> 
> 1. Please remove any reference to [BZ #23758] from this patch
> because it is not related with the bug.  The changes are minor
> and not visible for the users therefore they don't need any
> Bugzilla report, documentation, etc.
> 
> 2. Regarding the subject of this email, which is also the first
> line of the commit message, I would write something like this:
> 
> "strftime: Consequently use the "L_" macro with character literals."
> 
> As always, I am not a native speaker so other people may provide
> better hints.
> 
> 6.01.2019 07:33 TAMUKI Shoichi <tamuki@linet.gr.jp> wrote:
>>
>> At first, make an unrelated changes for the consistency.
> 
> If it is the part of the commit message then something like:
> 
> "Make unrelated changes for the consistency."
> 
> (The core problem is that "an" is incorrect for plural numbers.)
> 
>>
>> ChangeLog:
>>
>> 	[BZ #23758]
>> 	* time/strftime_l.c (__strftime_internal): Add missing uses of L_
>> 	macro, also add a missing space after the cast of _NL_CURRENT.
> 
> Good but again, Bugzilla mention should be removed and "missing
> uses" seems incorrect to me, "Add "L_" macros" or "Use "L_" macros"
> is sufficient and seems correct to me.
> 
> I cut the patch body here because it is correct and trivial, also
> I think it does not introduce any changes in the binary code but
> it's good because it improves the readability of the source code.
> Therefore I think it is OK to push it now with the changes above.
> But due to the freeze period I'd like to hear "OK" from Siddhesh
> therefore I'm adding CC: to him.

OK.

Siddhesh