Re: 转发:[PATCH] NUMA spinlock [BZ #23962]
H.J. Lu
hjl.tools@gmail.com
Thu Jan 3 19:59:00 GMT 2019
On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 6:52 AM Szabolcs Nagy <Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com> wrote:
>
> On 03/01/2019 05:35, 马凌(彦军) wrote:
> > create mode 100644 manual/examples/numa-spinlock.c
> > create mode 100644 sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/numa-spinlock-private.h
> > create mode 100644 sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/numa-spinlock.c
> > create mode 100644 sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/numa-spinlock.h
> > create mode 100644 sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/numa_spinlock_alloc.c
> > create mode 100644 sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86/tst-numa-variable-overhead.c
> > create mode 100644 sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86/tst-variable-overhead-skeleton.c
> > create mode 100644 sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86/tst-variable-overhead.c
>
> as far as i can tell the new code is generic
> (other than the presence of efficient getcpu),
> so i think the test should be generic too.
>
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86/tst-variable-overhead-skeleton.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,384 @@
> ...
> > +/* Check spinlock overhead with large number threads. Critical region is
> > + very smmall. Critical region + spinlock overhead aren't noticeable
> > + when number of threads is small. When thread number increases,
> > + spinlock overhead become the bottleneck. It shows up in wall time
> > + of thread execution. */
>
> yeah, this is not easy to do in a generic way, i think
> even on x86 such measurement is problematic, you don't
> know what goes on a system (or vm) when the glibc test
> is running.
>
> but doing precise timing is not that important for
> checking the correctness of the locks, so i think a
> simplified version can be generic test code.
Here is the updated patch to make tests generic.
--
H.J.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-NUMA-spinlock-BZ-23962.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 70370 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/attachments/20190103/e449ec7c/attachment.bin>
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list