Fix implicit-fallthrough warnings in tst-setjmp.c
Paul Eggert
eggert@cs.ucla.edu
Thu Feb 14 22:27:00 GMT 2019
On 2/14/19 2:23 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
>> Shouldn't we use the more-standard _Noreturn for this sort of thing? cdefs.h
>> defines _Noreturn for pre-C11 GCCs.
> The attribute seems much more widely used in glibc .c files at present.
Sure, but that habit predates C11. Now that we have a standard way to
say "this function does not return" it's surely better to use the
standard way, at least for new code and arguably even for old code.
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list