Question regarding patchwork patches
Lukasz Majewski
lukma@denx.de
Tue Feb 5 09:27:00 GMT 2019
Dear Paul, Albert,
I would like to ask about the status of following patchwork patches:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1015947/
[1/2] Y2038: make __mktime_internal compatible with __time64_t
and
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1015948/
[2/2] Fix time/mktime.c and time/gmtime.c for gnulib compatibility
The second one looks like changes necessary for gnulib to make it
working.
However, both seems to be relevant for Y2038 support. If I may ask -
are there any issues with including those two patches into the glibc?
I've checked and those clearly apply on top of <glibc-2.29> tag.
A side question - commit messages above mention about: x86_64-linux-gnu
and i686-linux.gnu toolchains.
The "toolchain" note for 2.29:
* On most architectures, GCC 5 or later is required to build the GNU C
Library. (On powerpc64le, GCC 6.2 or later is still required, as
before.)
Older GCC versions and non-GNU compilers are still supported when
compiling programs that use the GNU C Library.
Could you share the version used for testing those patches (and if
possible the name/url)?
Thanks in advance for help.
Best regards,
Lukasz Majewski
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-59 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: lukma@denx.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/attachments/20190205/bcc0bcda/attachment.sig>
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list