[PATCH] tst-clone3: Use __NR_futex_time64 if we don't have __NR_futex

[Alistair Francis]

On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 10:56 AM Alistair Francis <alistair23@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 9:42 AM Alistair Francis
> <alistair.francis@wdc.com> wrote:
> >
> > We can't include sysdep.h in the test case (it introduces lots of
> > strange failures) so __NR_futex isn't redifined to __NR_futex_time64 by
> > 64-bit time_t 32-bit archs (y2038 safe).
> >
> > To allow the test to pass let's just do the __NR_futex_time64 syscall if
> > we don't have __NR_futex defined.
>
> Ping!

Ping^2

>
> Alistair
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
> > ---
> >  sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/tst-clone3.c | 4 ++++
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/tst-clone3.c b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/tst-clone3.c
> > index 76f8b08a692..c211445e77f 100644
> > --- a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/tst-clone3.c
> > +++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/tst-clone3.c
> > @@ -56,7 +56,11 @@ f (void *a)
> >  static inline int
> >  futex_wait (int *futexp, int val)
> >  {
> > +#ifdef __NR_futex
> >    return syscall (__NR_futex, futexp, FUTEX_WAIT, val);
> > +#else
> > +  return syscall (__NR_futex_time64, futexp, FUTEX_WAIT, val);
> > +#endif
> >  }
> >
> >  static int
> > --
> > 2.23.0
> >