[patch] Correct range checking in mallopt/mxfast/tcache [BZ #25194]
Carlos O'Donell
codonell@redhat.com
Wed Dec 4 04:29:00 GMT 2019
On 12/3/19 6:09 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> From 2da566d7d7c956658d1d6009875ceab85b3d190b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
> Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2019 17:44:36 -0500
> Subject: Correct range checking in mallopt/mxfast/tcache [BZ #25194]
>
> do_set_tcache_max, do_set_mxfast:
> Fix two instances of comparing "size_t < 0"
> Both cases have upper limit, so the "negative value" case
> is already handled via (undefined) overflow semantics.
>
> mallopt:
> pass return value of do_set_mxfast to user.
>
> diff --git a/malloc/malloc.c b/malloc/malloc.c
> index 70cc35a473..ed16a72dbd 100644
> --- a/malloc/malloc.c
> +++ b/malloc/malloc.c
> @@ -5086,13 +5086,14 @@ do_set_arena_max (size_t value)
> static __always_inline int
> do_set_tcache_max (size_t value)
> {
> - if (value >= 0 && value <= MAX_TCACHE_SIZE)
> + if (value <= MAX_TCACHE_SIZE)
Does this allow mallopt to accept an invalid large negative
value but after wrapping be treated as less than MAX_TCACHE_SIZE
and thus be accepted instead of rejected?
mallopt takes an int value, and I think we should be checking
that input for validity before casting it.
> {
> LIBC_PROBE (memory_tunable_tcache_max_bytes, 2, value, mp_.tcache_max_bytes);
> mp_.tcache_max_bytes = value;
> mp_.tcache_bins = csize2tidx (request2size(value)) + 1;
> + return 1;
> }
> - return 1;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static __always_inline int
> @@ -5102,8 +5103,9 @@ do_set_tcache_count (size_t value)
> {
> LIBC_PROBE (memory_tunable_tcache_count, 2, value, mp_.tcache_count);
> mp_.tcache_count = value;
> + return 1;
> }
> - return 1;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static __always_inline int
> @@ -5119,7 +5121,7 @@ static inline int
> __always_inline
> do_set_mxfast (size_t value)
> {
> - if (value >= 0 && value <= MAX_FAST_SIZE)
> + if (value <= MAX_FAST_SIZE)
> {
> LIBC_PROBE (memory_mallopt_mxfast, 2, value, get_max_fast ());
> set_max_fast (value);
> @@ -5147,7 +5149,7 @@ __libc_mallopt (int param_number, int value)
> switch (param_number)
> {
> case M_MXFAST:
> - do_set_mxfast (value);
> + res = do_set_mxfast (value);
> break;
>
> case M_TRIM_THRESHOLD:
>
--
Cheers,
Carlos.
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list