[PATCH v9] y2038: Introduce the __ASSUME_TIME64_SYSCALLS define

Joseph Myers joseph@codesourcery.com
Tue Aug 27 21:55:00 GMT 2019


On Tue, 27 Aug 2019, Alistair Francis wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 12:35 PM Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 27 Aug 2019, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> >
> > > I think that gets everything important.  Neither the commit message
> > > nor the comment needs to list all the new system calls.
> >
> > The syscalls need to be listed to make clear exactly what the interfaces
> > covered by the macro are.
> 
> I'm a little confused, should I change anything or leave the patch as is?

My comments were on Zack's version (missing the list of syscalls).  I 
believe Zack's version is not ready to go in as is but needs further 
changes for the issues I described (listing the syscalls and referring to 
the possibility that they may be suffixed or unsuffixed).

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com



More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list