[PATCH v9] y2038: Introduce the __ASSUME_TIME64_SYSCALLS define
Joseph Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com
Tue Aug 27 21:55:00 GMT 2019
On Tue, 27 Aug 2019, Alistair Francis wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 12:35 PM Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 27 Aug 2019, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> >
> > > I think that gets everything important. Neither the commit message
> > > nor the comment needs to list all the new system calls.
> >
> > The syscalls need to be listed to make clear exactly what the interfaces
> > covered by the macro are.
>
> I'm a little confused, should I change anything or leave the patch as is?
My comments were on Zack's version (missing the list of syscalls). I
believe Zack's version is not ready to go in as is but needs further
changes for the issues I described (listing the syscalls and referring to
the possibility that they may be suffixed or unsuffixed).
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list