[PATCH] signal: Use correct type for si_band in siginfo_t [BZ #23562]

[Adhemerval Zanella]

On 22/10/2018 18:45, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Oct 2018, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
> 
>> I think we should XFAIL for both 32-bit and 64-bit, siginfo_t is passed
> 
> Since long int and int have the same size for 32-bit, I see no need to 
> XFAIL there when you can just use the proper POSIX type without affecting 
> the layout.
> 
I see your point, I would just like to keep documented that for SPARC there
is this small divergence between POSIX and kernel definition.